Sunday, January 24, 2010

Gut check time for the Democrats

Between the election of Scott Brown to the U.S. Senate, the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United, and (in North Carolina) the 51-count indictment of former Gov. Mike Easley's top aide Ruffin Poole, this week Democrats, especially those loyal to the Obama adminstration's leftward agenda, have absorbed a barrage of body shots.

So far, we see little indication that these blows have made an impression. On the Sunday talk shows, Obama spokespeople contend that nothing has changed, and that any voter anger from Massachusetts was expressed by those angry at Congress for not more quickly abandoning 230 years of (mostly) limited, constitutional government and transform the United States into an unapologetic social democracy.

Really? I wonder how much longer skittish Dems are going to drink this Kool-aid.

Michael Goodwin in The New York Post nailed the challenges Obama partisans face in a few, devastating paragraphs:

Massachusetts changed everything. America's spirit of independence has been emancipated and the cult of Obama-ism is finished.

The health-care debacle perfectly captured his utter lack of governing substance.

He embraced major provisions he rejected during the campaign, misled the public about costs and impact, and got competing versions through Congress only with a grab bag of outlandish bribes and exemptions.

He pledged transparency, then retreated to secret deal-making that corruptly rewarded unions and fleeced everybody else. The result was a national scandal that would have done tremendous damage if it became law.

His sudden adoption of a bank tax springs from a baser motive -- political desperation.

He unveiled the tax as polls showed Scott Brown closing in on victory. White House flunkies said the tax marked an aggressive turn to populism and Obama obliged by trotting out the "fat-cat banker" phrase.

Which, of course, is bizarre when you want those banks to lend money to create jobs. And you can be sure Obama will hit up those fat-cat bankers for contributions at election time, as he did in 2008. Even his attacks are cynical.

His foreign policy is a dangerous muddle. He is feckless about both Iran's brave dissidents and the mullahs pushing for nuclear weapons.

[SNIP]

The talk in Washington is that he look to Bill Clinton's presidency for comeback answers, or maybe Ronald Reagan's. Political history won't help him much.

Obama's crisis is personal. The inner hollowness and facile talent that propelled his rise gave him none of the grit necessary to meet the challenges. Where would he begin?

Maybe the events of the past weeks and months will make little difference to the faithful. I recall a social event I attended in the summer with several friends on the political left. We rarely talk politics, but I made a new acquaintance there, and when he asked me what I did and I said I work for a public-policy organization that advocates free-market positions, he incredulouly asked, "Why?" As if a single election had repudiated centuries of political thought -- including the principles that led to the founding of our nation.

I think people on the left (and the right, for that matter) can tend to hang out too much among their own and not reflect on why they believe as they do -- or at least understand how to articulate their vision comfortably in a civil way that tries to persuade gently rather than browbeat or preach.

Back to the present. I have no idea if the Democrats will somehow jam through a health care bill; maybe they'll pare back their ambitions and offer something that can appeal to enough squishy Republicans for passage. Maybe a reconciliation ploy would get through the Senate.

But if people on the left fail to take this week's happenings as an opportunity to (at a minimum) check their premises, there may be plenty more disappointments in their future.

Monday, January 18, 2010

All is well!

I have nothing more original to say about the Massachusetts Senate race than what I posted earlier tdoay on the Locker Room. Enjoy.


Saturday, January 16, 2010

People in Denver are going to be p.o'ed

Media News, owners of The Denver Post and a piece of more than 50 other newspapers (including some big ones in California), has filed for bankruptcy protection.

Hearst Corp., the owner of magazines and newspapers, has at least $400 million in equity and debt tied to MediaNews, and the investment will be wiped out by the bankruptcy filing, according to people familiar with the matter. A Hearst spokesman declined to comment.

Plenty of fans of my former employer, the Rocky Mountain News, were steamed that E.W. Scripps Co., the paper's owner, didn't try to outlast Media News — which was in deeper financial distress than Scripps — and instead closed the Rocky last year.

By all accounts, however, Scripps had no interest in fighting to keep open any of its major metro dailies. And it didn't want to hemorrhage millions of additional dollars waiting to see if Media News could hang on.

The Journal says Media News' dailies may not be affected by the filing, but you have to wonder how long its publications can avoid layoffs.

Monday, January 11, 2010

A new addition to the blogroll

My friend and former colleague Steve Sebelius is posting at a new blog: SlashPolitics.com, brought to you by City Life, the alt-weekly he edits.

SlashPolitics will focus on Las Vegas politics, and given the late unpleasantness involving Harry Reid, make sure to bookmark the blog. I certainly have.

Thursday, January 07, 2010

Paul Johnson, a Tar Heel?

News & Observer college football reporter J.P. Giglio offered this tantalizing nugget in today's column:

After the 2006 season, Georgia Tech head coach Paul Johnson was a candidate for the vacant coaching jobs at both UNC and N.C. State.

Of course, the reason neither Triangle school jumped at Johnson, in the way UNC did at [Butch] Davis, is because of his option offense. It's different, it's practically antiquated and, depending on the recruiting target, it's unattractive. There's also the matter of it not working when opponents are given time to prepare for it.

Johnson is 0-4 against teams coming off an open date, including two bowl losses when the opponent had a month to get ready.

But in the other 23 games, Johnson has 20 wins and an ACC title, which is something neither State nor UNC has won in 30 years.

I've been fascinated by Johnson's success at Tech, and wonder if he can keep it up. As Giglio suggests, it can be difficult to lure recruits to a BCS school that plays the triple option, especially offensive players who have aspirations of professional careers. If you throw the football no more than 10 or 12 times a game, linemen don't learn pass blocking, receivers don't get to catch many passes, and quarterbacks get beat up.

That may be a big reason schools with major talent run the option only sparingly. Johnson inherited a lot of talent from Chan Gailey. Can he continue convincing four- and five-star kids to come to Tech, knowing that their chances of playing in the NFL may be limited by the system they play? Or will Johnson have to set his sights on kids with lesser skills and "coach 'em up?"

To be sure, though, if Butch and Tom O'Brien continue delivering teams that play .500 ball and Johnson's clubs compete for BCS bowls (even if they lose), the natives will be justified in getting restless.

Friday, January 01, 2010

New decade, new blogging

Greetings! I'm still happily fighting the good fight at the John Locke Foundation with Carolina Journal.

But it's time to branch out and return to some of the themes from the early days of the Deregulator blog: pop culture, sports, food, wine, family, home life. Cara and I are also about to become homeowners again. And we'll be gardening ... so stay tuned.

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Where to find me

In case you haven't guessed, I'm blogging/posting elsewhere these days.

From now on, the best place to find me is on Facebook. Or as a regular contributor to the JLF blog The Locker Room.

See ya on the Interwebs ...

Monday, June 01, 2009

Weber Q-140 electric grill



Because years ago some careless dolt didn't pay attention to his grill (and burned down his apartment building), it's against the law in North Carolina to have any grill using an open flame on an apartment balcony or patio. Gas or charcoal grills must be at least 10 feet from the structure.

Which makes barbecuing on the third floor a challenge.

Not grilling was not an option. So I had to obtain an electric grill and researched the alternatives. The result: A Weber (duh).

The Q series comes in gas and electric models; and if you saw "Dear Food Network" last week, you'll recall one of the hosts (it may have been Aida Whatsername) cooking on one of the Q series gas models.

This grill is not cheap. We got it at Bed, Bath & Beyond and using the standard 20% off coupon it was about $220 including tax. But it's a terrific grill that should last for years. And when we move to a house, I can see it being our primary grill when we don't use charcoal -- when we're cooking for just us and it's burgers or hot dogs or any veggie or non-steak protein that requires direct heat and can cook in less than 15-20 minutes. In other words, we probably won't need a gas grill to supplement our Weber kettle.

On the highest setting, the Q-140 can reportedly reach temperatures of 600 degrees F. That's because Weber developed a reflective coating for the cover and the base that intensifies the heat from the element.




All I know is, it really can sear meat, as you can see from these pork chops.



And salmon



It also does indirect cooking well, too. Turkey thighs



Stuffed peppers



The final word: An outstanding alternative to lousy tabletop appliances or cheesy George Foreman models if you can't have an open flame. Comes apart for easy cleaning, too. And you can buy accessories, including a stand with wheels (and trays) giving you all the convenience of a "real" patio grill.

Highly recommended, notwithstanding the hefty price tag.

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Dems want Obama to make Easley/Edwards probes go away

"John Edwards admits federal investigators are asking him questions. Federal subpoenas were issued Friday related to Mike Easley.

"As the separate federal probes into a former senator and the former governor are emerging, Democrats are taking steps to replace the Republican prosecutor who is spearheading the inquiries about the highest-profile North Carolina Democrats of the past decade."

That's the lede of today's story by N&O reporter Andy Curliss on the deepening federal investigations of the two top Dems. (Curliss has been absolutely on fire lately.)

Curliss goes on to report that freshman Sen. Kay Hagan has chosen a panel to come up with successors to U.S. Attorney George Holding, a Bush appointee, who's led the probes. And Hagan said she might have a nominee in mind within a few weeks.

When a new president takes office (especially when that transition involves a change of parties), it's not at all unusual for the new administration to replace most if not all U.S. attorneys, not to mention other office-holders who serve at the pleasure of the president. Obama could have fired any or all of the nearly 100 federal prosecutors who worked for George W. Bush. But he didn't, and as Curliss reports,

So far, Obama has been slower to make changes than some of his predecessors. Bill Clinton asked all U.S. attorneys to resign when he took office, for example. Democrats this year also have signaled they want to keep some holdovers, including political independent Patrick Fitzgerald in Chicago, who is overseeing the case against former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, a Democrat.

So with Holding knee-deep in the Edwards and Easley probes, any move to replace him now sure would look like a calculated move to help Democrats escape scrutiny now, wouldn't it?

Friday, May 15, 2009

Newspapers may be dying but journalism isn't

Thoughts on a world that will increasingly on different sources of information. It's my first Carolina Journal column.